Part 2
Sandy Botkin is a CPA, attorney and former trainer of IRS attorneys nationwide. He lectures all over the nation on tax planning for self-employed and corporate taxpayers and can be seen in the big events with Donald Trump, Anthony Robins and many others. He has been written up in Newsweek and in many other magazines. He is also a syndicated writer and noted author of this famed tap;e series "Tax Strategies for Business Professionals" and "Tax and Financial Strategies for Residential Real Estate."
Where The Money Goes
Ms. Quinn's example assumed that a man was earning $ 40,000 per year. His wife ( we will call her Lori ) wasn't working. They had More month than money. (Sound familiar?) Lori subsequently got an administrative job for $ 15,000 per year. You would think this would improve the family's financial situation, but when Ms. Quinn examined the economics of getting this extra income, the results were startling!
Lori had to pay federal and state taxes on her new income. Since they filed jointly, the family's combined income was what established their tax bracket. She paid $ 4,500 in new taxes, most of which was non-deductible, for federal and state income tax.
Lori had social security withheld from her paycheck at the rate of 7.65% , which amounted to an additional nondeductible amount of $1,148 being extracted from her salary. She also had to commute to work 10 miles a day round trip, which is probably conservative for most people. This resulted ( in 1995 ) in nondeductible commuting cost of $ 696.
Lori also had some child care expenses, which give a partial tax credit. Ms Quinn figured that the amount spent over and beyond the tax credit was $ 4,250 per year.
Lori also ate out each day with colleagues, spending an average of $5 per day, five days a week. This results in a nondeductible expense of $ 1,250 per year. ( I would love to know where she ate for only $ 5!)
Now that Lori has a job, she has to have professional slothing, this means a hefty dry cleaning bill. Ms Quinn assumed that Lori's increased expenses here amounted to an extra $ 1,000 per year, nondeductible, of course.
Finally, with both spouses working, Lori wasn't in the mood to cook dinner every night. They bought more convenience foods and ate out more frequently. This resulted in increased food costs of a nondeductible $ 1,000 per year in minimum.
Add it all up and Lori's take home pay was a paltry $ 1,156 a year, for which she had to put up with a daily commute, an unpleasant boss, and corporate hassles.
No wonder more and more people are starting home-based businesses. In fact, there are currently an estimated 30 million people working from their homes. This number is expected to more than triple, to 97 million, by the year 2000, and to keep on growing. This has become and will continue to be one of the greatest mass movements in the U.S.
Click here to see more things from Sandy Botkin .
Dan and Deanna "Marketing Unscrambled"
6 comments:
Hi Dan and Deanna,
That's astounding and unreal!! It costs more money to have a job than it does to start a home-based business.
Everyone needs to read this! It deserves a Stumble!!
Thanks for a great and well-informed article!
Many Blessings....
Roxanne and Hugo ~ Believe Achieve
Hugo and Roxanne, when it is all said and done when she keeps less than $ 2,000 in a year after all the costs. It is worth Doing a home business.
Dan and Deanna "Marketing Unscrambled"
Dan and Deanna,
Excellent post for home-based business facts finding. For me the most important skill gained is being pro-active not being re-active. Most of hired people are re-active. It took me to rewind myself to be pro-active. If you can share your opinion on this point, I would be delighted.
Thank you for your sharing.
Shaw Funami
Fill the Missing Link
Hi Dan & Deanna .. the effects of the extra income are a shock .. we have the same here .. once you're in the government system .. you have less income when you get out .. & your working etc ..
Yes - we should work, be motivated etc .. and work gets us out, we learn out there .. more opportunities to find ..
Thanks .. fortunately I love what I'm doing ..
Hilary Melton-Butcher
Positive Letters
Shaw, you are so right. It is much better to be pro-active not re-active. If you are re-active than you are behind in the game. Someone else is pushing your buttons. If you are pro-active you are making the choices.
Dan and Deanna "Marketing Unscrambled"
Hilary, It is really hard to get ahead if you are not the one in charge of the choices. "What is the boss going to do, fire us, keep us on?" Thank you for your comments.
Dan and Deanna "Marketing Unscrambled"
Post a Comment